Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269681›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

The Value of Mobile Health in Improving Breastfeeding Outcomes Among Perinatal or Postpartum Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jiafen Qian, Tingting Wu, Meina Lv, Zongwei Fang, Mingrong Chen, Zhiwei Zeng, Shaojun Jiang, Wenjun Chen, Jinhua Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Biomarker-based text messages to promote lactation success in mothers of critically Ill infants: a randomized controlled pilot study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiafen Qian *Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-3452
Tingting Wu *Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-2059
Meina LvDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3900-7723
Zongwei FangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-8414
Mingrong ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-7104
Zhiwei ZengDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-838X
Shaojun JiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6722-0978
Wenjun ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5407-5110
Jinhua ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5629-0348
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding is essential for maintaining the health of mothers and babies. Breastfeeding can reduce the infection rate and mortality in newborns, and can reduce the chances of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. For mothers, a longer duration of breastfeeding can reduce the risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and type 2 diabetes. Although breastfeeding has many benefits, the global breastfeeding rate is low. With the progress of time, the popularity of mobile devices has increased rapidly, and interventions based on mobile health (mHealth) may have the potential to facilitate the improvement of the breastfeeding status.

objectiveThe main objective of this study was to analyze the existing evidence to determine whether mHealth-based interventions can improve the status of breastfeeding.

methodsWe systematically searched multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, and Vip ) to identify eligible studies published from 1966 to October 29, 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the influence of mHealth on breastfeeding. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool was used to examine the risk of publication bias. RevMan 5.3 was used to analyze the data.

resultsA total of 15 RCTs with a total sample size of 4366 participates met the inclusion criteria. Compared with usual care, interventions based on mHealth significantly increased the postpartum exclusive breastfeeding rate (odds ratio [OR] 3.18, 95% CI 2.20-4.59; P<.001), enhanced breastfeeding self-efficacy (mean difference [MD] 8.15, 95% CI 3.79-12.51; P=.002; I

conclusionsInterventions based on mHealth can significantly improve the rate of postpartum exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding efficacy, and participants' attitudes toward breastfeeding, and reduce health problems in infants. Therefore, encouraging women to join the mHealth team is feasible, and breastfeeding-related information can be provided through simple measures, such as text messages, phone calls, and the internet, to improve the health of postpartum women and their babies.

Indexed as

TelemedicineText MessagingAdolescentBreast FeedingChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPostpartum PeriodPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreastfeedingmeta-analysismHealthrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34269681
PMCPMC8325083
OpenAlexW3154964385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.