Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269480›Full record

Trial reportClinical transplantation2021

A distance-based living donor kidney education program for Black wait-list candidates: A feasibility randomized trial.

John C Sieverdes, Martina Mueller, Lynne S Nemeth, Sachin Patel, Prabhakar K Baliga, Frank A Treiber

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acceptability of a Mobile-Health Living Kidney Donor Advocacy Program for Black Wait-Listed Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John C SieverdesDepartment of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-4684
Martina MuellerCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-5142
Lynne S NemethCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8691-1400
Sachin PatelCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Prabhakar K BaligaCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Frank A TreiberCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-4131

Funding

SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
Enhancing Kidney Donation Through Live Organ Video Educated Donors (LOVED)R01DK098777 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BALIGA, PRABHAKAR K, TREIBER, FRANK A · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing racial disparities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among Black patients warrants innovative programs to improve living donation rates. The Living Organ Video Educated Donors (LOVED) program is a 2-arm, culturally-tailored, distance-based, randomized controlled feasibility trial. The group-based, 8-week program used peer-navigator led video chat sessions and web-app video education for Black kidney waitlisted patients from United States southeastern state. Primary feasibility results for LOVED (n = 24) and usual care (n = 24) arms included LOVED program tolerability (i.e., 95.8% retention), program fidelity (i.e., 78.9% video education adherence and 72.1% video chat adherence). LDKT attitudinal and knowledge results favored the LOVED group where a statistically significant effect was reported over 6-months for willingness to approach strangers (estimate ± SE: -1.0 ± .55, F(1, 45.3) = 7.5, P = .009) and self-efficacy to advocate for a LDKT -.81 ± .31, F(1, 45.9) = 15.2, P < .001. Estimates were improved but not statistically significant for willingness to approach family and friends, LDKT knowledge and concerns for living donors (all P's > .088). Secondary measures at 6 months showed an increase in calls for LOVED compared to usual care (P = .008) though no differences were found for transplant center evaluations or LDKTs. Findings imply that LOVED increased screening calls and attitudes to approach potential donors but feasibility outcomes found program materials require modification to increase adherence.

Indexed as

Living DonorsWaiting ListsBlack or African AmericanFeasibility StudiesHumansKidneyUnited Statesdonors and donation: livingethnicity/racekidney transplantation: living donorpatient educationtransplant coordinator

Identifiers

PMID34269480
PMCPMC9888645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.