Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3426920›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1987

Morphological and metastatic murine melanoma variants: motility, adhesiveness, cell surface and in vivo properties.

S R Clark, J S Brody, E Sidebottom

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S R ClarkSir William Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford, UK.
J S Brody
E Sidebottom
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behaviour in vivo of tight and loose variants of murine melanoma cells is further characterized. In vitro clonal morphology is reproduced on a variety of substrates. Results suggest that repeated selection of loose cells can co-select for cells with high metastatic and colonization potentials. Measurement of cell motility shows that 1G3 (loose) cells are more motile than 1G8 (tight) which are restricted to movements within clonal boundaries. Studies of adhesive properties show that loose cells are more easily detached from the substrate with trypsin or EDTA and that both cell lines attach more quickly to monolayers of loose cells than to tight ones. No gross differences are found either in attachment rates to plastic and ECM or in aggregation and disaggregation rates. Analysis of the cell surface has not revealed any differences between 1G8 and 1G3 in the sialylation of terminal galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine residues or in neuraminidase releasable sialic acid. The binding patterns of iodinated lectins to SDS-PAGE separated proteins are similar for both lines except for one 85/90 KD protein which is more abundant in 1G3 than 1G8 cells after neuraminidase treatment. The results show enhanced differences in metastatic potential of tight and loose clones after selective cloning and that there may be important differences in motility and cell-substrate interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell AggregationCell MovementElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelGlycosylationLectinsLung NeoplasmsMelanoma, ExperimentalMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsSialic AcidsTumor Cells, CulturedLectinsMembrane GlycoproteinsSialic Acids

Identifiers

PMID3426920
PMCPMC2001911
OpenAlexW1970813388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.