ArticleBritish journal of cancer1987
Morphological and metastatic murine melanoma variants: motility, adhesiveness, cell surface and in vivo properties.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Substrate adhesiveness and experimental metastatic potential of rat ascites hepatoma AH7974-derived variant sublines.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 1992Article
- Colonial morphology of tumour cells and susceptibility to cytolysis by tumour necrosis factor. The role of cellular fibronectin deposition in the extracellular matrix.British journal of cancer · 1990Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The behaviour in vivo of tight and loose variants of murine melanoma cells is further characterized. In vitro clonal morphology is reproduced on a variety of substrates. Results suggest that repeated selection of loose cells can co-select for cells with high metastatic and colonization potentials. Measurement of cell motility shows that 1G3 (loose) cells are more motile than 1G8 (tight) which are restricted to movements within clonal boundaries. Studies of adhesive properties show that loose cells are more easily detached from the substrate with trypsin or EDTA and that both cell lines attach more quickly to monolayers of loose cells than to tight ones. No gross differences are found either in attachment rates to plastic and ECM or in aggregation and disaggregation rates. Analysis of the cell surface has not revealed any differences between 1G8 and 1G3 in the sialylation of terminal galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine residues or in neuraminidase releasable sialic acid. The binding patterns of iodinated lectins to SDS-PAGE separated proteins are similar for both lines except for one 85/90 KD protein which is more abundant in 1G3 than 1G8 cells after neuraminidase treatment. The results show enhanced differences in metastatic potential of tight and loose clones after selective cloning and that there may be important differences in motility and cell-substrate interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.