Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269174›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2021

Rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in some French regions, June 2021.

Samuel Alizon, Stéphanie Haim-Boukobza, Vincent Foulongne, Laura Verdurme, Sabine Trombert-Paolantoni, Emmanuel Lecorche, Bénédicte Roquebert, Mircea T Sofonea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel AlizonMIVEGEC, CNRS, IRD, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie Haim-BoukobzaLaboratoire Cerba, Saint Ouen L'Aumône, France.
Vincent FoulongneLaboratoire de Virologie, CHU de Montpellier, France.
Laura VerdurmeLaboratoire Cerba, Saint Ouen L'Aumône, France.
Sabine Trombert-PaolantoniLaboratoire Cerba, Saint Ouen L'Aumône, France.
Emmanuel LecorcheLaboratoire Cerba, Saint Ouen L'Aumône, France.
Bénédicte RoquebertLaboratoire Cerba, Saint Ouen L'Aumône, France.
Mircea T SofoneaMIVEGEC, CNRS, IRD, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed 9,030 variant-specific RT-PCR tests performed on SARS-CoV-2-positive samples collected in France between 31 May and 21 June 2021. This analysis revealed rapid growth of the Delta variant in three of the 13 metropolitan French regions and estimated a +79% (95% confidence interval: 52-110%) transmission advantage compared with the Alpha variant. The next weeks will prove decisive and the magnitude of the estimated transmission advantages of the Delta variant could represent a major challenge for public health authorities.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2FranceHumansPublic HealthCOVID-19epidemiologyRT-PCRsimulationsstatistical modellingvariantvirus

Identifiers

PMID34269174
PMCPMC8284044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.