Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269160›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2022

Thoracic spine thrust manipulation for individuals with cervicogenic headache: a crossover randomized clinical trial.

Amy W McDevitt, Joshua A Cleland, Daniel I Rhon, Rebecca A K Altic, Drew J Courtney, Paul E Glynn, Paul E Mintken

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amy W McDevittDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Joshua A ClelandDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1930-6208
Daniel I RhonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4320-990X
Rebecca A K AlticCU Sports Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Drew J CourtneyDBS Fitness San Diego Physical Therapy, San Diego, California, USA.
Paul E GlynnGlynn Physical Therapy, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul E MintkenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1427-2424
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USAmerican Physical Therapy Association · USBrooke Army Medical Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) improves pain and disability in individuals with cervicogenic headache (CeH).

methodsA randomized controlled crossover trial was conducted on 48 participants (mean age: 34.4 years) with CeH symptoms. Participants were randomized to 6 sessions of TSM or no treatment (Hold) and after 4-weeks, groups crossed over. Outcomes were collected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks and included: headache disability inventory (HDI), neck disability index (NDI), and the global rating of change (GRC). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with Bonferroni correction. Odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the GRC of +4 or greater were also calculated. Scores at 4 weeks represent the only timepoint where 1 group is fully treated and other group has not received any treatment.

resultsComparing hold to active treatment, HDI were not significantly different between groups (mean difference = 7.39, 95 CI: -4.39 to 19.18; P = 0.214) at any timepoint; the NDI was significant (mean difference = 6.90, 95 CI: 0.05 to 13.75; P = 0.048) at 4 weeks. Odds of achieving the +4 MCID on the GRC (OR = 38.0, 95 CI: 6.6 to 220.0; p < 0.001) favored TSM at 4 weeks.

conclusionTSM had no effect on headache-related disability but resulted in significant improvements in neck-related disability and participant reported perceived improvement. Future studies are needed to examine the long-term impact of TSM in this population.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalPost-Traumatic HeadacheAdultCross-Over StudiesHumansNeck PainSpinecervicogenicHeadachethoracic manipulation

Identifiers

PMID34269160
PMCPMC8967200
OpenAlexW3179436189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.