Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269123›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2021

Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment.

Yuwen Gu, Elise DeDoncker, Richard VanEnk, Rajib Paul, Susan Peters, Gillian Stoltman, Diana Prieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuwen GuWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-7276
Elise DeDonckerWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Richard VanEnkBronson Methodist Hospital, Portage, MI, USA.
Rajib PaulUniversity of North Carolina Charlotte College of Health and Human Services, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Susan PetersMichigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Gillian StoltmanWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI.
Diana PrietoJohns Hopkins University Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4939-0786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is long perceived that the more data collection, the more knowledge emerges about the real disease progression. During emergencies like the H1N1 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemics, public health surveillance requested increased testing to address the exacerbated demand. However, it is currently unknown how accurately surveillance portrays disease progression through incidence and confirmed case trends. State surveillance, unlike commercial testing, can process specimens based on the upcoming demand (e.g., with testing restrictions). Hence, proper assessment of accuracy may lead to improvements for a robust infrastructure. Using the H1N1 pandemic experience, we developed a simulation that models the true unobserved influenza incidence trend in the State of Michigan, as well as trends observed at different data collection points of the surveillance system. We calculated the growth rate, or speed at which each trend increases during the pandemic growth phase, and we performed statistical experiments to assess the biases (or differences) between growth rates of unobserved and observed trends. We highlight the following results: 1) emergency-driven high-risk perception increases reporting, which leads to reduction of biases in the growth rates; 2) the best predicted growth rates are those estimated from the trend of specimens submitted to the surveillance point that receives reports from a variety of health care providers; and 3) under several criteria to queue specimens for viral subtyping with limited capacity, the best-performing criterion was to queue first-come, first-serve restricted to specimens with higher hospitalization risk. Under this criterion, the lab released capacity to subtype specimens for each day in the trend, which reduced the growth rate bias the most compared to other queuing criteria. Future research should investigate additional restrictions to the queue.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanDisease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2Disease spread modelinginfluenza surveillance evaluationinfluenza surveillance modelingrespiratory virus surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34269123
PMCPMC8488654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.