Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269072›Full record

ArticleCartilage2021

Differentiation of Cartilage Repair Techniques Using Texture Analysis from T

Vladimir Juras, Pavol Szomolanyi, Veronika Janáčová, Alexandra Kirner, Peter Angele, Siegfried Trattnig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladimir JurasHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4026-5922
Pavol SzomolanyiHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Veronika JanáčováHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra KirnerTETEC AG, Reutlingen, Germany.
Peter AngeleTETEC AG, Reutlingen, Germany.
Siegfried TrattnigHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate texture features from T

designSeventy-nine patients, after either microfracture (MFX) or matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantation (MACT), were examined on a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner with morphological and quantitative (T

resultsThere was no statistical significance found between MFX and MACT for T

conclusionTexture analysis using GLCM provides a useful extension to T

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularChondrocytesHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of Resultsarticular cartilagecartilage repairkneemagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34269072
PMCPMC8808785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.