ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2021
Establishment of a nomogram with EMP3 for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with glioma: A bi-center study.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- EMP3 as a prognostic biomarker correlates with EMT in GBM.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Epithelial Membrane Protein-3 and Chitinase-3-like Protein-1 as New Prognostic Predictors of Glioma, a Two-Gene Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Advances in the application of neuroinflammatory molecular imaging in brain malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Identification of a pyroptosis-related prognosis gene signature and its relationship with an immune microenvironment in gliomas.Medicine · 2022Article
- Differences in the Expression Patterns ofCancers · 2022Article
- Establishment of a nomogram with EMP3 for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with glioma: A bi-center study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo demonstrate the clinical value of epithelial membrane protein 3 (EMP3) with bioinformatic analysis and clinical data, and then to establish a practical nomogram predictive model with bicenter validation.
methodsThe data from CGGA and TCGA database were used to analyze the expression of EMP3 and its correlation with clinical prognosis. Then, we analyzed EMP3 expression in samples from 179 glioma patients from 2013 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate cox regression were used to predict the prognosis with multiple factors. Finally, a nomogram to predict poor outcomes was formulated. The accuracy and discrimination of nomograms were determined with ROC curve and calibration curve in training and validation cohorts.
resultsEMP3 was significantly higher in higher-grade glioma and predicted poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, high expression of EMP3 (HR = 2.842, 95% CI 1.984-4.071), WHO grade (HR = 1.991, 95% CI 1.235-3.212), and IDH1 mutant (HR = 0.503, 95% CI 0.344-0.737) were included. The nomogram was constructed based on the above features, which represented great predictive value in clinical outcomes.
conclusionThis study demonstrated EMP3 as a novel predictor for clinical progression and clinical outcomes in glioma. Moreover, the nomogram with EMP3 expression represented a practical approach to provide individualized risk assessment for glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.