Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268798›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2021

'Oh, I've got an appointment': A qualitative interview study exploring how to support attendance at diabetes screening after gestational diabetes.

Rebecca A Dennison, Claire L Meek, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Rachel A Fox, Catherine E Aiken, Simon J Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the lived experience of women with gestational diabetes: A cross-sectional Irish national survey.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Yonder: Frailty, gestational diabetes, shared cancer care, and Positive Health.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca A DennisonThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-0723
Claire L MeekInstitute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4176-8329
Juliet A Usher-SmithThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-2531
Rachel A FoxSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-9760
Catherine E AikenUniversity Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6510-5626
Simon J GriffinThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-4797

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21464Cancer Research UK C55650/A21464Department of Health SPCR-S-S102Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4Medical Research Council MR/T016701/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the views of women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on suggested practical approaches to support diabetes screening attendance after GDM, which is recommended but poorly attended.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 participants in Cambridgeshire, UK who had been diagnosed with GDM and were 3-48 months postpartum. Interviews covered whether participants had been screened and why, plans for future screening and their views on potential interventions to facilitate attendance (at the first postpartum test and annual testing). Framework analysis was used to analyse the transcripts. The interview schedule, suggested interventions and thematic framework were based on a recent systematic review.

resultsSixteen participants had undergone screening since pregnancy, explaining that they had an appointment arranged and wanted reassurance that they did not have diabetes. The participants who had not been tested were not aware that it was recommended. Only 13 had planned to attend subsequent tests at the start of the interview. Eight themes to support future attendance were discussed. The majority of the participants agreed that changing the processes for arranging tests, offering choice in test location and combining appointments would facilitate attendance. Child-friendly clinics, more opportunities to understand GDM and the role of postpartum testing, stopping self-testing and increasing their GP's awareness of their pregnancy received inconsistent feedback. The nature of the test used did not appear to influence attendance.

conclusionsThe participants wanted to be screened for diabetes after GDM. We have identified interventions that could be relatively simply incorporated into routine practice to facilitate screening attendance, such as flexibility in the appointment location or time and sending invitations for tests.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesDiabetes, GestationalPostpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultDelivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMass ScreeningPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adultgestational diabeteshealth service deliveryscreeningtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34268798
PMCPMC7614210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.