Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268728›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2021

Seizure detection using wearable sensors and machine learning: Setting a benchmark.

Jianbin Tang, Rima El Atrache, Shuang Yu, Umar Asif, Michele Jackson, Subhrajit Roy, Mahtab Mirmomeni, Sarah Cantley, Theodore Sheehan, Sarah Schubach and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Machine-learning methods for epilepsy diagnosis and therapeutic prevention: advances, setbacks, and opportunities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Wearable sensors in paediatric neurology.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AI and Neurology.Neurological research and practice · 2025
    Review
  19. Seizure Detection Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jianbin TangIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5440-0796
Rima El AtracheBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-1120
Shuang YuIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7428-2600
Umar AsifIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-7084
Michele JacksonBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-7333
Subhrajit RoyIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-5500
Mahtab MirmomeniIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0192-995X
Sarah CantleyBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-0960
Theodore SheehanBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8059-9388
Sarah SchubachBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6329-5761
Claire UfongeneBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Solveig VielufBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5532-8690
Christian MeiselDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2984-5480
Stefan HarrerIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-330X
Tobias LoddenkemperBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTracking seizures is crucial for epilepsy monitoring and treatment evaluation. Current epilepsy care relies on caretaker seizure diaries, but clinical seizure monitoring may miss seizures. Wearable devices may be better tolerated and more suitable for long-term ambulatory monitoring. This study evaluates the seizure detection performance of custom-developed machine learning (ML) algorithms across a broad spectrum of epileptic seizures utilizing wrist- and ankle-worn multisignal biosensors.

methodsWe enrolled patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit and asked them to wear a wearable sensor on either their wrists or ankles. The sensor recorded body temperature, electrodermal activity, accelerometry (ACC), and photoplethysmography, which provides blood volume pulse (BVP). We used electroencephalographic seizure onset and offset as determined by a board-certified epileptologist as a standard comparison. We trained and validated ML for two different algorithms: Algorithm 1, ML methods for developing seizure type-specific detection models for nine individual seizure types; and Algorithm 2, ML methods for building general seizure type-agnostic detection, lumping together all seizure types.

resultsWe included 94 patients (57.4% female, median age = 9.9 years) and 548 epileptic seizures (11 066 h of sensor data) for a total of 930 seizures and nine seizure types. Algorithm 1 detected eight of nine seizure types better than chance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] = .648-.976). Algorithm 2 detected all nine seizure types better than chance (AUC-ROC = .642-.995); a fusion of ACC and BVP modalities achieved the best AUC-ROC (.752) when combining all seizure types together. SIGNIFICANCE: Automatic seizure detection using ML from multimodal wearable sensor data is feasible across a broad spectrum of epileptic seizures. Preliminary results show better than chance seizure detection. The next steps include validation of our results in larger datasets, evaluation of the detection utility tool for additional clinical seizure types, and integration of additional clinical information.

Indexed as

EpilepsySeizuresWearable Electronic DevicesBenchmarkingChildElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaledeep learningepilepsymachine learningmultisensor recordingswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID34268728
PMCPMC8457135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.