Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268649›Full record

ReviewChinese journal of integrative medicine2022

Is Regular Probiotic Practice Safe for Management of Sepsis?

Rishabh Kumar, Alok Shiomurti Tripathi, Nidhi Sharma, Gaaminepreet Singh, Lucy Mohapatra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rishabh KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga (Punjab), India.
Alok Shiomurti TripathiDepartment of Pharmacology, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Lucknow (UP), India. astripathi@lko.amity.edu.
Nidhi SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga (Punjab), India.
Gaaminepreet SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga (Punjab), India.
Lucy MohapatraDepartment of Pharmacology, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Lucknow (UP), India.
Indo Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, the gut has been thought to play an important role in sepsis pathogenesis. Sepsis is a serious life-threatening, chronic condition of an infection caused by dysregulated host immune response in most of the intensive care unit patients. Probiotics have dual roles in polymicrobial sepsis i.e. probiotics may induce sepsis in many cases and may prevent its prognosis in many cases. Experimental evidence from both pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that probiotic therapy ameliorates various inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-6, etc., in septicemia. In addition, probiotic use was also found to reduce the severity of pathological conditions associated with irritable bowel disorder and prevent development of endocarditis in septicemia. On contrary, probiotic therapy in neonatal and athymic adult mice fail to provide any beneficial effects on mortality and sepsis-induced inflammation. Importantly, in few clinical trials probiotic use was found to aggravate sepsis by promoting inflammatory cascade rather than suppressing it. This review discusses various studies regarding the beneficial or harmful effects associated with probiotic therapy in sepsis.

Indexed as

ProbioticsSepsisAnimalsHumansInflammationMiceTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaimmune systemmicrobial floraprobioticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID34268649
OpenAlexW3182492211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.