ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2021
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of myocardial microcirculation changes in rats from different altitudes based on CT myocardial perfusion imaging.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Coronary artery volume to left ventricular myocardial mass ratio in detecting primary microvascular angina: a retrospective observational study in Chinese population.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Advances in the diagnosis and management of post-percutaneous coronary intervention coronary microvascular dysfunction: Insights into pathophysiology and metabolic risk interactions.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Incorporating Inflammation Biomarker-Driven Multivariate Predictive Model for Coronary Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Acute Myocardial Infarction Following Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- The value of myocardial work in the estimation of left ventricular systolic function in patients with coronary microvascular disease: A study based on adenosine stress echocardiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Global trends and frontiers in research on coronary microvascular dysfunction: a bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2022.European journal of medical research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to provide an overview of diagnostic and treatment considerations in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). RECENT
findingsThe prevalence of obstructive CAD in unselected patient populations referred for evaluation of angina is less than 10%. A significant proportion of patients with angina and no obstructive CAD have CMD, a condition associated with impaired cardiovascular prognosis. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular function is feasible and widely available, yet CMD is underdiagnosed and undertreated. A patient-tailored treatment approach guided by coronary microvascular testing shows promising results for patient-reported outcomes of symptom burden and quality of life. Coronary microvascular testing should be considered in angina patients with no obstructive CAD, before other causes of chest pain are explored. A patient-tailored treatment approach guided by a complete evaluation of epicardial anatomy and macro-and microvascular function may help optimize treatment strategy and prevent unnecessary medical interventions. More research is needed to establish the long-term effect of patient-tailored therapies on risk reduction in CMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.