Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268567›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.

Yongqi Zhong, Edward H Kennedy, Lisa M Bodnar, Ashley I Naimi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrographic Features of Catatonia With or Without Comorbid Delirium.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology.European journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Causal Inference Methods for Combining Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: A Review.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Implementing TMLE in the presence of a continuous outcome.Research methods in medicine & health sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yongqi Zhong
Edward H Kennedy
Lisa M Bodnar
Ashley I Naimi

Funding

Informing national guidelines on diet patterns that promote healthy pregnancy outcomesR01HD102313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
Estimating the Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin on Fetal Loss in a Trial with Non-ComplianceR01HD093602 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093602NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of recent studies have suggested that doubly robust estimators with cross-fitting should be used when estimating causal effects with machine learning methods. However, not all existing programs that implement doubly robust estimators support machine learning methods and cross-fitting, or provide estimates on multiplicative scales. To address these needs, we developed AIPW, a software package implementing augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimation of average causal effects in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Key features of the AIPW package include cross-fitting and flexible covariate adjustment for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this paper, we use a simulated RCT to illustrate implementation of the AIPW estimator. We also perform a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the AIPW package compared with other doubly robust implementations, including CausalGAM, npcausal, tmle, and tmle3. Our simulation showed that the AIPW package yields performance comparable to that of other programs. Furthermore, we also found that cross-fitting substantively decreases the bias and improves the confidence interval coverage for doubly robust estimators fitted with machine learning algorithms. Our findings suggest that the AIPW package can be a useful tool for estimating average causal effects with machine learning methods in RCTs and observational studies.

Indexed as

CausalityData Interpretation, StatisticalMachine LearningSoftware DesignBiasComputer SimulationHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaverage causal effectscausal inferencedoubly robust estimationepidemiologic methodsmachine learningnonparametric statistics

Identifiers

PMID34268567
PMCPMC8796813
OpenAlexW3177528852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.