Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268436›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021

Applications of artificial intelligence in oncologic

Mohammad S Sadaghiani, Steven P Rowe, Sara Sheikhbahaei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The prognostic utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. PET/MR Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. coPERCIST: AI-assisted PET-CT response assessment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Preclinical Evaluation of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison ofEJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prediction ofCancers · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. PET Imaging in Bladder Cancer: An Update and Future Direction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Breast PET/MRI Hybrid Imaging and Targeted Tracers.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad S SadaghianiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Steven P RoweThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sara SheikhbahaeiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing field of research that is emerging as a promising adjunct to assist physicians in detection and management of patients with cancer.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)FDGmachine learningoncologypositron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID34268436
PMCPMC8246218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.