Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268432›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

SPECTnet: a deep learning neural network for SPECT image reconstruction.

Wenyi Shao, Steven P Rowe, Yong Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. EANM practice guideline for quantitative SPECT-CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Training End-to-End Unrolled Iterative Neural Networks for SPECT Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Dielectric Breast Phantoms by Generative Adversarial Network.IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenyi ShaoDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Steven P RoweDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Yong DuDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

Multi-Modality Quantitiative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA140204 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG, SOLNES, LILJA · 2011 to 2022
$6.1M
Optimization and Validation of Improved Quantitative I-123 Brain SPECT ImagingR01NS094227 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG · 2016 to 2019
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140204NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an important functional tool for clinical diagnosis and scientific research of brain disorders, but suffers from limited spatial resolution and high noise due to hardware design and imaging physics. The present study is to develop a deep learning technique for SPECT image reconstruction that directly converts raw projection data to image with high resolution and low noise, while an efficient training method specifically applicable to medical image reconstruction is presented.

methodsA custom software was developed to generate 20,000 2-D brain phantoms, of which 16,000 were used to train the neural network, 2,000 for validation, and the final 2,000 for testing. To reduce development difficulty, a two-step training strategy for network design was adopted. We first compressed full-size activity image (128×128 pixels) to a one-D vector consisting of 256×1 pixels, accomplished by an autoencoder (AE) consisting of an encoder and a decoder. The vector is a good representation of the full-size image in a lower-dimensional space and was used as a compact label to develop the second network that maps between the projection-data domain and the vector domain. Since the label had 256 pixels only, the second network was compact and easy to converge. The second network, when successfully developed, was connected to the decoder (a portion of AE) to decompress the vector to a regular 128×128 image. Therefore, a complex network was essentially divided into two compact neural networks trained separately in sequence but eventually connectable.

resultsA total of 2,000 test examples, a synthetic brain phantom, and de-identified patient data were used to validate SPECTnet. Results obtained from SPECTnet were compared with those obtained from our clinic OS-EM method. Images with lower noise and more accurate information in the uptake areas were obtained by SPECTnet.

conclusionsThe challenge of developing a complex deep neural network is reduced by training two separate compact connectable networks. The combination of the two networks forms the full version of SPECTnet. Results show that the developed neural network can produce more accurate SPECT images.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkDeep learningimage reconstructionquantitative imagingSPECT

Identifiers

PMID34268432
PMCPMC8246183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.