ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScavenging energy from biomechanical motions
methodsThe MTT(3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was used to detect the cell proliferation of H9C2 cells and HUVECs at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Computed tomography (CT) and cardiac ultrasound were used to evaluate the position and heart rate of pacemakers 12 weeks after implantation, and the changes of plasma biochemical indexes were detected by a biochemical detector.
resultsAt 12 weeks after implantation, CT results showed that there were no changes in the position of the self-powered pacemaker. The device implanted into the thoracic cavity of rats demonstrated certain effects on cardiac function, while it did not have a significant effect on their blood biochemical indexes.
conclusionsthe flexible buckling piezoelectric vibratory energy collector did not produce adverse effects on the myocardial tissue or on the normal proliferation of myocardial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.