Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268402›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Regional ventilation distribution in healthy lungs: can reference values be established for electrical impedance tomography parameters?

Lin Yang, Meng Dai, Xinsheng Cao, Knut Möller, Mantas Dargvainis, Inéz Frerichs, Tobias Becher, Feng Fu, Zhanqi Zhao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin YangDepartment of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Meng DaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xinsheng CaoDepartment of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Knut MöllerInstitute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Mantas DargvainisDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Inéz FrerichsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Tobias BecherDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Feng FuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhanqi ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Air Force Medical University · CNFurtwangen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is widely used for monitoring regional ventilation distribution, reference values have yet to be established for clinical use. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of creating reference values for standard EIT parameters for potential clinical application.

methodsA total of 75 participants with healthy lungs were included in this prospective study (male:female, 48:27; age, 34±14 years; height, 172±7 cm; weight, 73±12 kg). The subjects were examined during spontaneous breathing in the supine position. EIT measurements were performed at the level of the 4

resultsFollowing outlier detection, EIT data from 71 subjects were finally evaluated. The values of the evaluated parameters were: CoV, 48.7%±1.7%; TVD, 48.1%±5.4%; TV

conclusionsOur study indicated that CoV and GI were stable parameters with small coefficients of variation in participants with healthy lungs. The creation of EIT parameter reference values for setting treatment targets may be feasible.

Indexed as

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)regional ventilation distributionstandard EIT parameters

Identifiers

PMID34268402
PMCPMC8246208
OpenAlexW3137685834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.