ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Genetic identification of pathogenic variations of the
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental finding of aFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Natural history of Becker muscular dystrophy: a multicenter study of 225 patients.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2023Review
- Update of the Brazilian consensus recommendations on Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023Review
- Improvements of nuclease and nickase gene modification techniques for the treatment of genetic diseases.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn elevated level of creatine kinase (CK) is usually the primary screening marker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)/Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). This study investigated the clinical application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in newborns with a possible diagnosis of DMD/BMD in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
methodsNGS data from the NICU between June 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, were reanalyzed by an in-house pipeline. Other methods confirmed the genetic findings, and clinical follow-up was performed until August 1, 2020.
resultsOf the 10,481 newborns, 19 (0.18%, 19/10,481) cases with pathogenic variations of the
conclusionsOur study showed that DMD/BMD could be diagnosed earlier in the neonatal stage before the typical clinical symptoms appear. Early diagnosis may provide an opportunity for guiding the care and treatment of patients. However, ethical issues need to be kept in mind in the process of genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.