ReviewJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Oral Health System in Myanmar: A Review.
Review in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of evidence in the oral health international data: Contributions for a global profile.PloS one · 2025Article
- Self-reported oral health-related quality of life and caries experiences of 5-year-old children in Mandalay, Myanmar.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Early childhood caries and its associated factors among 5-years-old Myanmar children.Frontiers in oral health · 2024Article
- A scoping review on the links between sustainable development goal 14 and early childhood caries.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Current status and needs in the primary healthcare system in Yangon, Myanmar: a mixed-method evaluation.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe study aims at reviewing Myanmar's current situation to consider an improved oral health system and at promoting the oral health status of the Myanmar population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review was conducted using the World Health Organization's (WHO's) six building blocks of the health system: oral health-care service delivery, dental workforce, oral health information system, essential medicine, health financing, and leadership and governance. The review was established on scientific articles and documents and information from reliable government and nongovernment organizations' websites.
resultsAccording to the National Oral Health Survey (2016-2017), the prevalence rate of untreated caries in six-year-old Myanmar children (84.1%), and in the 35-44 and 65-74 age group (above 40%) is high, which reflects a low utilization of oral health-care services. The dentist to population ratio is approximately 1:16,000: There are around 5,000 dentists and 400 trained dental nurses in Myanmar, and only about 1,000 dentists serve in government sectors. The inequalities in dental health care are compounded by a limited dental workforce and inequality of dentists between the public and private sectors in Myanmar. In the last National Health Plan (NHP, 2006-2011), the Myanmar government's funding for required dental equipment and materials in each dental unit (around 5726 USD) has been considered inadequate. The current expenditure is not transparent. The other challenges are an insufficient supply of dental materials and instruments to all public dental sectors and a lack of oral health-care infrastructure.
conclusionsSuch findings suggest a pressing need to address the effective oral health-care system and decree the specific goals for the Myanmar population's oral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.