ArticleGland surgery2021
Application value of conventional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography in diagnosing triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of an ultrasound feature-based diagnostic model for predicting triple-negative breast cancer using 108 machine learning algorithm combinations.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound imaging in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer and benign breast lesions using multiparametric ultrasonography.Journal of ultrasonography · 2025Article
- Ultrasound elastography features as promising predictors of pathological complete response in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Correlation between Baseline Conventional Ultrasounds, Shear-Wave Elastography Indicators, and Neoadjuvant Therapy Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt present, most ultrasound (US) studies on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited to conventional US features, so it is necessary to develop new joint diagnostic methods. The study aims to explore the values of conventional US and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differential diagnoses of TNBC and non-TNBC.
methodsA total of 120 breast cancer (BC) patients involving 120 lesions that were pathologically verified were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All participants had received both conventional US and SWE before surgery. Meanwhile, the participants were divided into a TNBC group or a non-TNBC group according to their immunohistochemical (IHC) results. The differences between the conventional US features (including lesion shape, growth location, margin, boundary, internal echo, micro-calcification, posterior echo, and internal blood supply) and the SWE image features [including mean lesion hardness (Emean), maximum (Emax), minimum (Emin), standard deviation (SD), and ratio to normal gland (Eratio)] of 2 groups were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the diagnosed lesion was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsAccording to the findings of conventional US, the TNBC group mostly manifested as a micro-lobulated margin, with a clear boundary and no internal micro-calcification; the non-TNBC group mainly manifested as marginal angulation or burr, and hyper-echo halo in the boundary, accompanied with internal micro-calcification, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the internal thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) and resistance index between the TNBC group and non-TNBC group were similar, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The findings of SWE were as follows: differences in Emax, Emean, and Eratio values between 2 groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of these three in diagnosing the lesions were 0.811, 0.781 and 0.770, respectively.
conclusionsConventional US combined with SWE can comprehensively analyze the morphological, blood supply, and hardness features of breast lesions, and provide more reliable information for the differential diagnosis between TNBC and non-TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.