Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268068›Full record

ArticleAdditive manufacturing2021

Digital light processing in a hybrid atomic force microscope:

Callie I Higgins, Tobin E Brown, Jason P Killgore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Lithography-based 3D printing of hydrogels.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Callie I HigginsApplied Chemicals and Materials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Tobin E BrownApplied Chemicals and Materials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Jason P KillgoreApplied Chemicals and Materials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO 80305, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) are powerful additive manufacturing techniques that address a wide range of applications including regenerative medicine, prototyping, and manufacturing. Unfortunately, these printing processes introduce micrometer-scale anisotropic inhomogeneities due to the resin absorptivity, diffusivity, reaction kinetics, and swelling during the requisite photoexposure. Previously, it has not been possible to characterize high-resolution mechanical heterogeneity as it develops during the printing process. By combining DLP 3D printing with atomic force microscopy in a hybrid instrument, heterogeneity of a single, in situ printed voxel is characterized. Here, we describe the instrument and demonstrate three modalities for characterizing voxels during and after printing. Sensing Modality I maps the mechanical properties of just-printed, resin-immersed voxels, providing the framework to study the relationships between voxel sizes, print exposure parameters, and voxel-voxel interactions. Modality II captures the nanometric, in situ working curve and is the first demonstration of in situ cure depth measurement. Modality III dynamically senses local rheological changes in the resin by monitoring the viscoelastic damping coefficient of the resin during patterning. Overall, this instrument equips researchers with a tool to develop rich insight into resin development, process optimization, and fundamental printing limits.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopyDigital light processingIn Situ characterizationPhotopolymerizationStereolithography

Identifiers

PMID34268068
PMCPMC8276139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.