ReviewCureus2021
Elucidating the Intriguing Association Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an umbrella review.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Pooled it
- Coronary artery calcification progression and renal involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Residual Traditional Risk in Non-Traditional Atherosclerotic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Expression and Significance of Programmed Death-1 and Its Ligands in the Accelerated Formation of Atherosclerosis in an Induced Murine Lupus Model.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have demonstrated a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), resulting in it being one of the leading causes of death in SLE patients. SLE itself acts as a sole risk factor influencing the prevalence and progression of CVD. However, conventional risk factors, such as age, hypertension, smoking, and obesity, play a crucial role as well. Therefore, this systematic review attempts to unravel the association of CVD in SLE patients while evaluating the role of conventional risk factors. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to search the PubMed database starting from March 2021 systematically. Original studies that evaluated the prevalence and progression of CVD in SLE patients were extracted by two reviewers independently. Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Most studies have a moderate to low risk of bias. Among 3,653 studies identified by our search, 10 studies were included in the review. Strong epidemiologic evidence of SLE patients having an increased relative risk of CVD compared to controls was found. Traditional CVD risk factors, such as age, hypertension, obesity, and smoking, influence the prevalence of CVD among SLE patients. Several SLE-specific factors such disease activity, duration, and certain medications also acted as influencing factors. However, the relative risk of CVD was still higher in SLE patients after adjustment of certain risk factors. One study found that the odds of having a Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) score greater than zero in women with SLE aged less than or equal to 45 years was 12.6 times higher than women in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) cohort (95% CI 5.2 to 30.7) (participants of CARDIA cohort acted as control). This finding was made after age, hypertension, total cholesterol levels, and aspirin use were adjusted, and the study was restricted to women. Although conventional risk factors increase CVD prevalence, SLE itself also dramatically increases the prevalence of CVD. Therefore, we recommend that SLE should be treated as a "CVD risk equivalent." SLE patients should be managed more extensively with greater emphasis given to cardiac health for better clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.