Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268018›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2021

Toward genomic selection in

Madison Caballero, Edwin Lauer, Jeremy Bennett, Sumaira Zaman, Susan McEvoy, Juan Acosta, Colin Jackson, Laura Townsend, Andrew Eckert, Ross W Whetten and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Colonization of root endophytic fungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Toward genomic selection inApplications in plant sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Madison CaballeroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5105
Edwin LauerDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.
Jeremy BennettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USA.
Sumaira ZamanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USA.
Susan McEvoyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USA.
Juan AcostaDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-5166
Colin JacksonDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.
Laura TownsendDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.
Andrew EckertDepartment of Biology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia 23284 USA.
Ross W WhettenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-4137
Carol LoopstraDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology Texas A&M University College Station Texas 77843 USA.
Jason HollidayDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg Virginia 24061 USA.
Mihir MandalDepartment of Biology Claflin University Orangeburg South Carolina 29115 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-0528
Jill L WegrzynDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-0888
Fikret IsikDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-7919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseAn informatics approach was used for the construction of an Axiom genotyping array from heterogeneous, high-throughput sequence data to assess the complex genome of loblolly pine (

methodsHigh-throughput sequence data, sourced from exome capture and whole genome reduced-representation approaches from 2698 trees across five sequence populations, were analyzed with the improved genome assembly and annotation for the loblolly pine. A variant detection, filtering, and probe design pipeline was developed to detect true variants across and within populations. From 8.27 million variants, a total of 642,275 were evaluated and 423,695 of those were screened across a range-wide population.

resultsThe final informatics and screening approach delivered an Axiom array representing 46,439 high-confidence variants to the forest tree breeding and genetics community. Based on the annotated reference genome, 34% were located in or directly upstream or downstream of genic regions. DISCUSSION: The Pita50K array represents a genome-wide resource developed from sequence data for an economically important conifer, loblolly pine. It uniquely integrates independent projects that assessed trees sampled across the native range. The challenges associated with the large and repetitive genome are addressed in the development of this resource.

Indexed as

exome capturegenomic selectiongenotype arraygenotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS)loblolly pinePinus taedavariant detection

Identifiers

PMID34268018
PMCPMC8272584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.