Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34268017›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2021

Algae to angiosperms: Autofluorescence for rapid visualization of plant anatomy among diverse taxa.

Timothy J Pegg, Daniel K Gladish, Robert L Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy J PeggDepartment of Biology Miami University Oxford Ohio 45056 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-0667
Daniel K GladishDepartment of Biology Miami University Oxford Ohio 45056 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-7532
Robert L BakerDepartment of Biology Miami University Oxford Ohio 45056 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-5035
Miami University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseFluorescence microscopy is an effective tool for viewing plant internal anatomy. However, using fluorescent antibodies or labels hinders throughput. We present a minimal protocol that takes advantage of inherent autofluorescence and aldehyde-induced fluorescence in plant cellular and subcellular structures to markedly increase throughput in cellular and ultrastructural visualization. METHODS AND

resultsTwelve species distributed across the plant phylogeny were each subjected to five fixative treatments: 1% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde, formalin-acid-alcohol (FAA), and 70% ethanol. Samples were prepared by embedding and mechanically sectioning or via whole mount. A confocal laser scanning system was used to collect micrographs. We evaluated and compared fixative influence on sample structural preservation and tissue autofluorescence.

conclusionsFormaldehyde fixation of Viridiplantae taxa samples generates useful structural data while requiring no additional histological staining or clearing. In addition, a fluorescence-capable microscope is the only specialized equipment required for image acquisition. The minimal protocol developed in this experiment enables high-throughput sample processing by eliminating the need for multi-day preparations.

Indexed as

aldehydeanatomyautofluorescencecellularfixationmethodsmicroscopysubcellularthroughputViridiplantae

Identifiers

PMID34268017
PMCPMC8272585
OpenAlexW3178149758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.