Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267962›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale hemsirelik dergisi2019

[Evidence-Based Practices in Episiotomy Care].

Asuman Çobanoğlu, Merdiye Şendir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale hemsirelik dergisi, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07748182 (The Effect of Boric Acid Wet Dressing on Perineal Wound Healing and Pain Level in Postpartum Perineal Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07748182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Boric Acid Wet Dressing on Perineal Wound Healing and Pain Level in Postpartum Perineal Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled91ConditionsPerineal Trauma, Episiotomy, Episiotomy Wound, Perineal PainArms2% Boric Acid Wet Dressing, 0.9% Normal Saline Wet Dressing, Routine Care Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asuman ÇobanoğluGiresun Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü, Giresun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5656-1910
Merdiye ŞendirSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-1669
Giresun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the research associated with wound healing process in episiotomy care.

methodThe search for this study was conducted through the international databases of Cochrane, Science Direct, Medline, Medine Complete, CIHANL, Scopus, AcademicSearch Complete, Complementary Index and ULAKBIM medical database among the National Databases between May 1 and July 17, 2017. "Episiotomy care" and "episiotomy wound healing" were used as key words during the search. A total of 23 publications compliant with the inclusion criteria were included in the study and were evaluated in terms of comparisons, restrictions, and results.

resultsStudies about episiotomy care were evaluated under four headings such as the use of antiseptic solutions, use of dry/wet and hot and cold applications, laser and light therapy, and the use of aromatic oils and phytotherapy in episiotomy care. Among the 23 studies included in this study, 17 were designed as experimental and 6 as half-experimental and a total of 2.408 puerperal women participated in this study.

conclusionThe results of this literature review revealed a limited number of research findings on the care of episiotomy wounds and a necessity of performance of new studies on this subject was established.

Indexed as

Episiotomy careepisotomy wound healingnursing care

Identifiers

PMID34267962
PMCPMC8127595
OpenAlexW2920919264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.