Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267948›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study.

Enola K Proctor, Virginia R McKay, Emre Toker, Thomas M Maddox, Cole Hooley, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Simon MacGibbon, Bradley Evanoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Enola K ProctorBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-6003
Virginia R McKayBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Emre TokerWashington University Medical School in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas M MaddoxHealthcare Innovation Lab, BJC HealthCare/Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Cole HooleySchool of Social Work, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Rebecca Lengnick-HallBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Simon MacGibbonMyia Labs Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bradley EvanoffDivision of General Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBJC HealthCare · USBrigham Young University · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
GWB MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH TRAININGT32MH019960 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Byron James Powell · 1995 to 2026
$11.1M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Educational Program to Improve Innovation and Entrepreneurial Thinking in Biomedical ResearchersR25GM116727 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, JESSE ALAN, KINCH, MICHAEL S. · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM116727NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance the timeliness and patient-centeredness of cardiovascular care. Specifically, we sought to understand a partnership between a private digital health startup company, a university innovation lab, and an academic health system's cardiology program pursuing this goal.

findingsThe collaboration proceeded through clear phases to address the questions and challenges: problem definition, exploration and formalization of the partnership, innovation co-creation and pilot test, and scale-up planning. Phases were punctuated by key decisions, such as forming the partnership, negotiating terms of the partnership, iterating form and features of the innovation, and exploring sufficiency of its value-add for scale-up and sustainment. Key implementation concepts were apparent, including implementation strategies (e.g., champions and iterative trialing) and the implementation outcomes of acceptability, sustainment, and scale-up. Participants identified potential risks of collaboration, reflected on their co-creation process, and the value of engaging stakeholders in innovation design. Findings may inform subsequent collaborations between innovators and translational researchers.

methodsWe conducted a case study to understand the partnership; characterize the questions they pursued, their decision points, information and data sources; and identify the challenges and risks. Data were collected through a series of four focus groups with members of each partnering organization. A transdisciplinary research team iteratively worked to condense and synthesize data from audio recorded transcripts into a case narrative.

Indexed as

implementationinnovationpartnershippersonalized careTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID34267948
PMCPMC8278157
OpenAlexW3153893814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.