Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267941›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

How to manage pes cavus in children and adolescents?

Ignacio Sanpera, Sandra Villafranca-Solano, Carmen Muñoz-Lopez, Julia Sanpera-Iglesias

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ignacio SanperaHospital Universitary Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes BalearsSpain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7203-8479
Sandra Villafranca-SolanoHospital Universitary Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes BalearsSpain.
Carmen Muñoz-LopezHospital Universitary Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Illes BalearsSpain.
Julia Sanpera-IglesiasEvelina Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Hospital Universitario Son Espases · ESEvelina London Children's Healthcare · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pes cavus in its different forms is not a pathological entity, but rather the manifestation of multiple diseases.Cavovarus, a form of cavus foot, should never be considered a physiological deformity. A neurological condition should always be excluded.The evolution of pes cavovarus is unpredictable because of the large number of conditions involved in its aetiology, as well as their variable degree of expression. About 66% of cavovarus feet are the result of subtle neurological diseases, which only become evident later in life.Although surgery may not change quality of life, recent studies suggest that it may improve foot posture and reduce walking instability.The aim of treatment is to preserve a painless, plantigrade, mobile foot. Management consists of correcting bone deformity while preserving movement, and the wise use of rebalancing techniques. Arthrodesis should only be a salvage procedure. Cite this article:

Indexed as

cavovaruscavuschildren

Identifiers

PMID34267941
PMCPMC8246104
OpenAlexW3173666667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.