Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267934›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

Closing the loop: a 10-year experience with routine outcome measurements to improve treatment in hand surgery.

Reinier Feitz, Yara E van Kooij, Marloes H P Ter Stege, Mark J W van der Oest, J Sebastiaan Souer, Robbert M Wouters, Harm P Slijper, Ruud W Selles, Steven E R Hovius, Hand–Wrist Study Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reflections on Managing the Performance of Value-Based Healthcare: A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reinier FeitzHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yara E van KooijHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marloes H P Ter StegeHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J W van der OestHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Sebastiaan SouerHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robbert M WoutersHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harm P SlijperHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruud W SellesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven E R HoviusHand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hand–Wrist Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine outcome measurements as a critical prerequisite of value-based healthcare have received considerable attention recently. There has been less attention for the last step in value-based healthcare where measurement of outcomes also leads to improvement in the quality of care. This is probably not without reason, since the last part of the learning cycle: 'Closing the loop', seems the hardest to implement.The journey from measuring outcomes to changing daily care can be troublesome. As early adopters of value-based healthcare, we would like to share our 10 years of experience in this journey.Examples of feedback loops are shown based on outcome measurements implemented to improve our daily care process as a focused hand surgery and hand therapy clinic.Feedback loops can be used to improve shared decision making, to monitor or predict treatment progression over time, for extreme value detection, improve journal clubs, and surgeon evaluation.Our goal as surgeons to improve treatment should not stop at the act of implementing routine outcome measurements.We should implement routine analysis and routine feedback loops, because real-time performance feedback can accelerate our learning cycle. Cite this article:

Indexed as

dashboardpatient-reported experience measurementspatient-reported outcome measurementsscorecardsurgeon feedback loopvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34267934
PMCPMC8246110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.