Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267930›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

Optimal microbiological sampling for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection.

Ricardo Sousa, André Carvalho, Ana Cláudia Santos, Miguel Araújo Abreu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Raman Monitoring ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is the isolation of S. epidermidis from pre-operative synovial fluid culture a predictor of S. epidermidis prosthetic joint infection?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Aetiology of long bone chronic osteomyelitis: an analysis of the current situation in one region in Egypt.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The impact of a multidisciplinary team on the management of fracture-related infections: A surveillance study in Brazil.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo SousaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-7347
André CarvalhoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3741-849X
Ana Cláudia SantosPorto Bone and Joint Infection Group (GRIP), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto and Grupo TrofaSaude, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-7896
Miguel Araújo AbreuPorto Bone and Joint Infection Group (GRIP), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto and Grupo TrofaSaude, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-6641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection is a dire complication afflicting every field of orthopaedics and traumatology. If specific clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters are present, infection is often assumed even in the absence of microbiological confirmation. However, apart from confirming infection, knowing the exact infecting pathogen(s) and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns is paramount to help guide treatment. Every effort should therefore be undertaken with that goal in mind.Not all microbiological findings carry the same relevance, and knowing exactly how and where a sample was collected is key. Several different sampling techniques are available, and one must be aware of both advantages and limitations. Microbiological sampling alternatives in some of the most common clinical scenarios such as native and prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis and fracture-related infections, spinal and diabetic foot infections will be discussed.Orthopaedic surgeons should also be aware of basic laboratory sample processing techniques as they have a direct impact on the way specimens should be dealt with and transported to the laboratory. Only by knowing these basic principles will surgeons be able to participate in the multidisciplinary discussion and decision making around how to interpret microbiological findings in each specific patient. Cite this article:

Indexed as

bone and joint infectionsmicrobiologytissue sampling

Identifiers

PMID34267930
PMCPMC8246105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.