Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267767›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Yuko Krzyzaniak, Frédéric Cointault, Camille Loupiac, Eric Bernaud, Frédéric Ott, Christophe Salon, Anthony Laybros, Simeng Han, Marie-Claire Héloir, Marielle Adrian and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent trends in root phenomics of plant systems with available methods- discrepancies and consonances.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuko KrzyzaniakAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Frédéric CointaultAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Camille LoupiacUMR A 02-102 PAM Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.
Eric BernaudAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Frédéric OttLaboratoire Léon Brillouin, UMR 12 CEA-CNRS, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Christophe SalonAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Anthony LaybrosAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Simeng HanAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Marie-Claire HéloirAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Marielle AdrianAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Sophie TrouvelotAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root system plays an essential role in the development and physiology of the plant, as well as in its response to various stresses. However, it is often insufficiently studied, mainly because it is difficult to visualize. For grapevine, a plant of major economic interest, there is a growing need to study the root system, in particular to assess its resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, understand the decline that may affect it, and identify new ecofriendly production systems. In this context, we have evaluated and compared three distinct growing methods (hydroponics, plane, and cylindric rhizotrons) in order to describe relevant architectural root traits of grapevine cuttings (mode of grapevine propagation), and also two 2D- (hydroponics and rhizotron) and one 3D- (neutron tomography) imaging techniques for visualization and quantification of roots. We observed that hydroponics tubes are a system easy to implement but do not allow the direct quantification of root traits over time, conversely to 2D imaging in rhizotron. We demonstrated that neutron tomography is relevant to quantify the root volume. We have also produced a new automated analysis method of digital photographs, adapted for identifying adventitious roots as a feature of root architecture in rhizotrons. This method integrates image segmentation, skeletonization, detection of adventitious root skeleton, and adventitious root reconstruction. Although this study was targeted to grapevine, most of the results obtained could be extended to other plants propagated by cuttings. Image analysis methods could also be adapted to characterization of the root system from seedlings.

Indexed as

2D/3D imaginggrapevineneutron tomographyphenotypingrhizotronroot system architectureroot traits

Identifiers

PMID34267767
PMCPMC8276046
OpenAlexW3175506584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.