ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021
When Is Simultaneous Recording Necessary? A Guide for Researchers Considering Combined EEG-fMRI.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early spatiotemporal dynamics of navigational affordance coding in the dorsal visual cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Visual imagery of familiar people and places in category selective cortex.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Editorial: Multimodal approaches to investigating neural dynamics in cognition and related clinical conditions: integrating EEG, MEG, and fMRI data.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
- High-quality multimodal MRI with simultaneous EEG using conductive ink and polymer-thick film nets.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Integrative approach of omics and imaging data to discover new insights for understanding brain diseases.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Application status and prospects of multimodal EEG-fMRI in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Bimodal electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset for inner-speech recognition.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Neurophysiological hallmarks of Huntington's disease progression: an EEG and fMRI connectivity study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: What Have We Learned and What Does the Future Hold?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Preservation of EEG spectral power features during simultaneous EEG-fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- EEG Microstate Analysis and the EEG Inverse Problem Solution as a Tool for Diagnosing Cognitive Dysfunctions in Individuals Who Have Had a Mild Form of COVID-19.Human physiology · 2022Article
- Simultaneous electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of human brain function.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Genetic association of apolipoprotein E genotype with EEG alpha rhythm slowing and functional brain network alterations during normal aging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- On the Role of Neural Oscillations Across Timescales in Speech and Music Processing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- The link between steady-state EEG and rs-fMRI metrics in healthy young adults: The effect of macrovascular correction.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide non-invasive measures of brain activity at varying spatial and temporal scales, offering different views on brain function for both clinical and experimental applications. Simultaneous recording of these measures attempts to maximize the respective strengths of each method, while compensating for their weaknesses. However, combined recording is not necessary to address all research questions of interest, and experiments may have greater statistical power to detect effects by maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio in separate recording sessions. While several existing papers discuss the reasons for or against combined recording, this article aims to synthesize these arguments into a flow chart of questions that researchers can consider when deciding whether to record EEG and fMRI separately or simultaneously. Given the potential advantages of simultaneous EEG-fMRI, the aim is to provide an initial overview of the most important concepts and to direct readers to relevant literature that will aid them in this decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.