ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021
A Preliminary Exploration of the Efficacy of Gentamicin Sponges in the Prevention and Treatment of Wound Infections.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional antibiotic delivery for sternal wound infection prophylaxis a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- VX-702 Ameliorates the Severity of Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury by Downregulating Inflammatory Factors in Macrophages.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to construct drug-loading and drug-releasing quantitative equations for gentamicin sponges in addition to realizing a gentamicin sponge for wound infection prevention and treatment.
methodsSterile sponges were cut into pieces of 1×1 × 0.5 cm and immersed in 40, 16, 8, 4, 1.6, 0.8, or 0 mg/mL of gentamicin solution for 12, 24, 48, 96, or 120 h to evaluate their gentamicin loading. The sponges were subsequently immersed in the gentamicin solution of different concentrations for 48 h, air-dried, and then immersed in 10 mL of 0.9% physiological saline to evaluate the gentamicin release. Methicillin-sensitive
resultsThe antibacterial zone sizes of the sponges immersed in 40, 16, 8, 4, 1.6, and 0.8 mg/mL of the gentamicin solution were larger than those of the 0 mg/mL air-dried sponge, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). The rats in the 40, 16, and 8 mg/mL air-dried sponge groups had no wound suppuration in either the MSSA or
conclusionA quantified equation for the sponges' gentamicin loading and release was achieved with high accuracy. Furthermore, we recommend the 40, 16, or 8 mg/mL air-dried sponge for the treatment of wounds with antibiotic-sensitive bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.