ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2021
Au Nanoclusters Ameliorate
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of nanoclusters in the design and development of novel strategies for diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Nanotherapies based on bacterial metabolism: Mechanisms, design and application.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Article
- Size and charge effects of metal nanoclusters on antibacterial mechanisms.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Size-dependent gold nanoparticles induce macrophage M2 polarization and promote intracellular clearance ofMaterials today. Bio · 2023Article
- GPR35-mediated kynurenic acid sensing contributes to maintenance of gut microbiota homeostasis in ulcerative colitis.FEBS open bio · 2023Article
- Antibacterial Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) againstInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsAu NCs and
resultsAu NCs (100 μM) interfered with oxidative metabolism genes, induced a substantial increase in ROS levels, interacted with the cell membrane to destroy it, significantly killed
conclusionThe effective antibacterial effect and good safety suggest that Au NCs represent a good potential alternative to antibiotics to treat
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.