Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267469›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2021

Myeloablative Versus Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis.

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Dharma Choudhary, Divya Doval, Vipin Khandelwal, Amee Patel, Rasika Setia, Tina Dadu, Anil Handoo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjeev Kumar SharmaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4887-4933
Dharma ChoudharyDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Divya DovalDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Vipin KhandelwalDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Amee PatelDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Rasika SetiaDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Tina DaduDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
Anil HandooDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, 110005 India.
BLK Super Speciality Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conditioning regimens used for the allo-HSCT include either myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens based on the age, performance status and co-morbidities. Studies comparing the survival outcomes of RIC and MAC allo-HSCT in AML and MDS patients have reported contradictory results. We therefore retrospectively analyzed our data of AML and MDS patients who received MAC and RIC allo-HSCT at our center and compared the long term outcome of the two conditioning regimens. One hundred twenty six consecutive patients were evaluated, 32 (25.4%) underwent MAC allo-HSCT and 94 (74.6%) underwent RIC allo-HSCT. The most common MAC regimen used was busulfan plus cyclophosphamide and the most common RIC regimen used was fludarabine plus melphalan. The median age was higher in RIC group (44 years, range 4-75 years) compared to MAC group (31 yrs, range 6-51 yrs,

Indexed as

Allogeneic stem cell transplantGVHDMyeloablative conditioningOverall survivalReduced intensity conditioning

Identifiers

PMID34267469
PMCPMC8239118
OpenAlexW3101584333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.