Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267233›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A simple microscopy setup for visualizing cellular responses to DNA damage at particle accelerator facilities.

Haibin Qian, Ron A Hoebe, Michel R Faas, Marc Jan van Goethem, Emiel R van der Graaf, Christoph Meyer, Harry Kiewiet, Sytze Brandenburg, Przemek M Krawczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haibin QianDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location AMC) and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron A HoebeDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location AMC) and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel R FaasDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location AMC) and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc Jan van GoethemDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emiel R van der GraafDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christoph Meyer
Harry KiewietDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sytze BrandenburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Przemek M KrawczykDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location AMC) and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.krawczyk@amsterdamumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) not only promote genomic integrity in healthy tissues, but also largely determine the efficacy of many DNA-damaging cancer treatments, including X-ray and particle therapies. A growing body of evidence suggests that activation of the mechanisms that detect, signal and repair DSBs may depend on the complexity of the initiating DNA lesions. Studies focusing on this, as well as on many other radiobiological questions, require reliable methods to induce DSBs of varying complexity, and to visualize the ensuing cellular responses. Accelerated particles of different energies and masses are exceptionally well suited for this task, due to the nature of their physical interactions with the intracellular environment, but visualizing cellular responses to particle-induced damage - especially in their early stages - at particle accelerator facilities, remains challenging. Here we describe a straightforward approach for real-time imaging of early response to particle-induced DNA damage. We rely on a transportable setup with an inverted fluorescence confocal microscope, tilted at a small angle relative to the particle beam, such that cells can be irradiated and imaged without any microscope or beamline modifications. Using this setup, we image and analyze the accumulation of fluorescently-tagged MDC1, RNF168 and 53BP1-key factors involved in DSB signalling-at DNA lesions induced by 254 MeV α-particles. Our results provide a demonstration of technical feasibility and reveal asynchronous initiation of accumulation of these proteins at different individual DSBs.

Indexed as

DNA DamageParticle AcceleratorsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEquipment DesignHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ImagingProof of Concept StudyRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsMDC1 protein, humanRNF168 protein, humanTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID34267233
PMCPMC8282881
OpenAlexW3178783897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.