Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34267196›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Dietary thiols accelerate aging of C. elegans.

Ivan Gusarov, Ilya Shamovsky, Bibhusita Pani, Laurent Gautier, Svetlana Eremina, Olga Katkova-Zhukotskaya, Alexander Mironov, Alexander А Makarov, Evgeny Nudler

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Hyperactive 20Science advances · 2025
    Article
  20. An acyltransferase protectsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan GusarovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ilya ShamovskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Bibhusita PaniDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Laurent GautierDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Svetlana EreminaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Olga Katkova-ZhukotskayaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander MironovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander А MakarovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny NudlerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. evgeny.nudler@nyumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8811-3071
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUNew York University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant cellular antioxidant. As reactive oxygen species (ROS) are widely believed to promote aging and age-related diseases, and antioxidants can neutralize ROS, it follows that GSH and its precursor, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), are among the most popular dietary supplements. However, the long- term effects of GSH or NAC on healthy animals have not been thoroughly investigated. We employed C. elegans to demonstrate that chronic administration of GSH or NAC to young or aged animals perturbs global gene expression, inhibits skn-1-mediated transcription, and accelerates aging. In contrast, limiting the consumption of dietary thiols, including those naturally derived from the microbiota, extended lifespan. Pharmacological GSH restriction activates the unfolded protein response and increases proteotoxic stress resistance in worms and human cells. It is thus advantageous for healthy individuals to avoid excessive dietary antioxidants and, instead, rely on intrinsic GSH biosynthesis, which is fine-tuned to match the cellular redox status and to promote homeostatic ROS signaling.

Indexed as

AcetylcysteineAgingAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDietary SupplementsDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliFemaleFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationGlutathioneHumansMaleParaquatAcetylcysteineCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGlutathioneParaquatReactive Oxygen Speciesskn-1 protein, C elegansSulfhydryl CompoundsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34267196
PMCPMC8282788
OpenAlexW3179416572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.