ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021
Non-traumatic spinal cord infarction of the conus medullaris in a child: a case report.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe etiologies of pediatric spinal cord infarction are commonly cardiovascular problems resulting from hypotensive events from trauma and abdominal aortic surgery. Non-traumatic spinal cord infarction in children is rare and remains difficult to diagnose. We report a case of non-traumatic spinal cord infarction of the conus medullaris in a child who recovered after receiving only rehabilitative treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 12-year-old female patient experienced sudden low back pain for 2 days, followed by weakness in the lower extremities and difficulties in micturition. On admission, magnetic resonance imaging indicated spinal cord infarction of the conus medullaris. After initial treatment with prednisone and mannitol, a few weeks of intensive rehabilitation was recommended. Physical therapy focused on improving lower limb strength. A plastic solid ankle-foot orthosis was used with Lofstrand crutches throughout the period of rehabilitation. After 2 months of rigorous therapy, she was able to walk independently. DISCUSSION: Non-traumatic spinal cord infarction of the conus medullaris in children is extremely rare. The current case is unique because it involves a patient who presented with pediatric spinal cord infarction of the conus medullaris and showed remarkable neurological recovery after rehabilitation. The case describes a rare spinal cord infarction in a pediatric patient and emphasizes the importance of providing an accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.