Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266754›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

Utilizing a cognitive engineering approach to conduct a hierarchical task analysis to understand complex older adult decision-making during over-the-counter medication selection.

Ashley O Morris, Aaron Gilson, Michelle A Chui, Ka Xiong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley O MorrisUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Social and Administrative Sciences Division, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: amorris4@wisc.edu.
Aaron GilsonSonderegger Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, USA.
Michelle A ChuiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Social and Administrative Sciences Division, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, USA; Sonderegger Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, USA.
Ka XiongWisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 W Wilson St, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWisconsin Department of Health Services · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Improving Over-the-Counter Medication Safety for Older AdultsR18HS024490 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHUI, MICHELLE ANNE · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS024490NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults aged 65+ (older adults) disproportionately consume 30% of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and are largely responsible for making OTC treatment decisions because providers lack awareness of their consumption. These treatment decisions are complex: older adults must navigate age-related body/cognitive changes, developed comorbidities, and complex medication regimens when selecting the right OTC. Yet little is known about how older adults make such decisions.

objectivesThis study characterizes older adults' cognitive decision-making process when seeking to self-medicate with OTCs from their community pharmacy, and demonstrates how hierarchical task analysis (HTA) can be used to evaluate a pharmacy intervention's impact on their decision-making.

methodsA pre-/post-implementation approach, using a think-aloud interview process, was conducted with older adults within a community pharmacy setting as they completed a hypothetical scenario to treat either pain, sleep, or cough/cold/allergy symptoms. HTA developed a conceptualization of older adult decision-making regarding OTC selection and use before/after Senior Section implementation.

resultsAn HTA constructed from 12 purposefully-selected interviews (pre-n = 9/post-n = 3), consisting of 8 goals/15 sub-goals. While selecting an OTC, older adults considered quantity, cost, form, regimen, safety, strength, appropriateness of OTC safety, generic/name-brand, past experiences, and ingredients. The intervention reduced by half the number of factors considered. IMPLICATIONS: Older adult decision-making is more complex than just selecting OTC medication from a pharmacy shelf. HTA-informed decision profiles can provide pharmacists critical insights into safety issues that older adults may not be considering (e.g., factors related to safety, strength, or appropriateness of OTC for symptoms) so that pharmacists can support their decision-making.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmaciesAgedCognitionHumansNonprescription DrugsPharmacistsNonprescription Drugscognitive task analysiscommunity pharmacyhierarchical task analysisolder adultover-the-counter medication

Identifiers

PMID34266754
PMCPMC8551020
OpenAlexW3179781090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.