Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266499›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2021

BioVerbNet: a large semantic-syntactic classification of verbs in biomedicine.

Olga Majewska, Charlotte Collins, Simon Baker, Jari Björne, Susan Windisch Brown, Anna Korhonen, Martha Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The robotic-surgery propositional bank.Language resources and evaluation · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olga MajewskaLanguage Technology Laboratory, MMLL, University of Cambridge, 9 West Road, Cambridge, CB39DB, UK. om304@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-8817
Charlotte CollinsLanguage Technology Laboratory, MMLL, University of Cambridge, 9 West Road, Cambridge, CB39DB, UK.
Simon BakerLanguage Technology Laboratory, MMLL, University of Cambridge, 9 West Road, Cambridge, CB39DB, UK.
Jari BjörneDepartment of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, Turku, 20500, Finland.
Susan Windisch BrownDepartment of Linguistics, University of Colorado Boulder, 295 UCB, Boulder, 80309-0295, Colorado, USA.
Anna KorhonenLanguage Technology Laboratory, MMLL, University of Cambridge, 9 West Road, Cambridge, CB39DB, UK.
Martha PalmerDepartment of Linguistics, University of Colorado Boulder, 295 UCB, Boulder, 80309-0295, Colorado, USA.

Funding

European Research Council 648909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in representation learning have enabled large strides in natural language understanding; However, verbal reasoning remains a challenge for state-of-the-art systems. External sources of structured, expert-curated verb-related knowledge have been shown to boost model performance in different Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks where accurate handling of verb meaning and behaviour is critical. The costliness and time required for manual lexicon construction has been a major obstacle to porting the benefits of such resources to NLP in specialised domains, such as biomedicine. To address this issue, we combine a neural classification method with expert annotation to create BioVerbNet. This new resource comprises 693 verbs assigned to 22 top-level and 117 fine-grained semantic-syntactic verb classes. We make this resource available complete with semantic roles and VerbNet-style syntactic frames.

resultsWe demonstrate the utility of the new resource in boosting model performance in document- and sentence-level classification in biomedicine. We apply an established retrofitting method to harness the verb class membership knowledge from BioVerbNet and transform a pretrained word embedding space by pulling together verbs belonging to the same semantic-syntactic class. The BioVerbNet knowledge-aware embeddings surpass the non-specialised baseline by a significant margin on both tasks.

conclusionThis work introduces the first large, annotated semantic-syntactic classification of biomedical verbs, providing a detailed account of the annotation process, the key differences in verb behaviour between the general and biomedical domain, and the design choices made to accurately capture the meaning and properties of verbs used in biomedical texts. The demonstrated benefits of leveraging BioVerbNet in text classification suggest the resource could help systems better tackle challenging NLP tasks in biomedicine.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSemanticsLanguageText classificationVerb lexiconVerbNet

Identifiers

PMID34266499
PMCPMC8280585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.