Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266462›Full record

Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

High-dose thoracic radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a novel grading scale of radiation-induced lung injury for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis.

Weronika Maria Szejniuk, Martin Skovmos Nielsen, Zsuzsanna Takács-Szabó, Jacek Pawlowski, Sahar Sulaiman Al-Saadi, Panagiotis Maidas, Martin Bøgsted, Tine McCulloch, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, Ursula Gerda Falkmer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Weronika Maria SzejniukDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. wms@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6790-6710
Martin Skovmos NielsenDepartment of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Zsuzsanna Takács-SzabóDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jacek PawlowskiDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sahar Sulaiman Al-SaadiDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Panagiotis MaidasDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin BøgstedDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tine McCullochDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jens Brøndum FrøkjærDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ursula Gerda FalkmerDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Oluf Dimitri RøeDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) may be a serious complication after thoracic radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This prospective observational study sought to evaluate the utility of a novel radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) grading scale (RGS) for the prediction of RP. MATERIALS AND

methodsData of 41 patients with NSCLC treated with thoracic RT of 60-66 Gy were analysed. CT scans were scheduled before RT, one month post-RT, and every three months thereafter for one year. Symptomatic RP was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2. RGS grading ranged from 0 to 3. The inter-observer variability of the RGS was assessed by four senior radiologists. CT scans performed 28 ± 10 days after RT were used to analyse the predictive value of the RGS. The change in the RGS severity was correlated to dosimetric parameters.

resultsThe CT obtained one month post-RT showed RILI in 36 (88%) of patients (RGS grade 0 [5 patients], 1 [25 patients], 2 [6 patients], and 3 [5 patients]). The inter-observer agreement of the RGS grading was high (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance = 0.80, p < 0.01). Patients with RGS grades 2-3 had a significantly higher risk for development of RP (relative risk (RR): 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.7, p < 0.01) and RP symptoms within 8 weeks after RT (RR: 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-17.6, p < 0.01) compared to RGS grades 0-1. The specificity and sensitivity of the RGS grades 2-3 in predicting symptomatic RP was 100% (95% CI 80.5-100%) and 45.4% (95% CI 24.4-67.8%), respectively. Increase in RGS severity correlated to mean lung dose and the percentage of the total lung volume receiving 5 Gy.

conclusionsThe RGS is a simple radiologic tool associated with symptomatic RP. A validation study is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung InjuryLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationOrgans at RiskPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiation PneumonitisRadiometryNon-small cell lung cancer radiation therapyRadiation-induced lung injuryRadiation pneumonitisRadiation-related pulmonary toxicityRadiation therapy toxicityRadiological radiation-induced lung injury scale

Identifiers

PMID34266462
PMCPMC8281688
OpenAlexW3182493261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.