Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266444›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system.

Rachid Rassir, Inger N Sierevelt, Marjolein Schager, Peter A Nolte, ATKOS group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04247672 (The ATtune Knee Outcome Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04247672 recruitingnot on this map

The ATtune Knee Outcome Study: Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Uncemented Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeobservationalSponsorSpaarne GasthuisRan2020 to 2036Enrolled900ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Rheumatism, Rheumatoid ArthritisArmsTotal Knee Arthroplasty (uncemented rotating platform ATTUNE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachid RassirSpaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. rrassir@spaarnegasthuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-6617
Inger N SiereveltSpaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Marjolein SchagerSpaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Peter A NolteSpaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
ATKOS group

Funding

DePuy Synthes DPS-JMP-2020-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard for treatment of debilitating symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Even though providing satisfactory results for the majority of patients, some studies report dissatisfaction after TKA to be as high as 20%. Among other things, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy are thought to compromise results of TKA. Implant manufacturers keep improving upon their designs in an attempt to improve functional outcomes. One of these novel knee systems is the Attune. To our knowledge, there are no clinical follow-up studies reporting results of the uncemented version. The main objective of this multicentre prospective observational study is to evaluate revision rate, complications, radiographic outcomes (i.e. alignment and radiolucent lines) and patient reported outcomes of the uncemented Attune mobile bearing TKA. Secondary objectives are (1) to assess physical function, return to sport and return to work after TKA and (2) to evaluate the long-term effect of preoperative psychological factors on satisfaction after TKA.

methodsAll patients presenting in the participating centres with knee pathology warranting joint replacement therapy will be considered for inclusion, an absolute indication for cemented fixation is the only exclusion criterium. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic performance (e.g. radiolucent lines) is done at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after surgery using validated patient reported outcome measures. Cumulative revision rates are calculated after 5 and 10 years using Kaplan-Meier methods. Physical function is assessed with performance based measurements before and 1 year after surgery. Return to sports is assessed using the Tegner and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale before and 1 year after surgery. Return to work is evaluated by inviting patients of working age to complete a short questionnaire 1 year after surgery. Psychologic factors are assessed using questionnaires for pain catastrophising, pain self-efficacy and mental health before, 5 years and 10 years after surgery. Preoperative psychologic scores are correlated to functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: The current study aims to report the clinical performance of a novel implant and can help provide insight in factors that play a role in satisfaction after TKA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04247672 (January 30, 2020).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAttunePain catastrophizingPain self-efficacyPatient reported outcome measuresSportSurvivorshipTotal knee arthroplastyUncementedWork

Identifiers

PMID34266444
PMCPMC8283948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.