Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266433›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2021

Barriers and facilitators to promoting evidence uptake in Chinese medicine: a qualitative study in Hong Kong.

Charlene Hoi Lam Wong, Jeffrey Van Ho Tse, Per Nilsen, Leonard Ho, Irene Xin Yin Wu, Vincent Chi Ho Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Increasing Equity Through Technology: A Comparison of Opinion Leader Identification Methods in Primary Care.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlene Hoi Lam WongJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Jeffrey Van Ho TseJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Per NilsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Building 511-001, Entrance 76, plan 13, Campus US, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Leonard HoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Chung Chi College, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Irene Xin Yin WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Rm 527 5/F, 238 Shangmayuanling Alley, Kaifu District, Changsha, China. irenexywu@csu.edu.cn.
Vincent Chi Ho ChungJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Prince of Wales Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNHong Kong Jockey Club · CNLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the World Health Organization's recommendation, policy makers have been adopting evidence-based healthcare approach to promote the development of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) into Hong Kong's health system. Disseminating synopses of clinical evidence from systematic reviews or randomized trials is regarded as a potentially effective strategy to promote evidence uptake. The study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing this strategy among Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs).

methodsTwenty-five CMPs aged under 45 years and trained in Hong Kong after reunification with China in 1997 were interviewed individually. Four clinical evidence synopses of randomized trials and systematic reviews on Chinese medicine interventions were presented, and CMPs were asked to comment on their applicability in routine practice. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied to guide interview and analysis.

resultsThe barriers included: i) CMPs' perceived difficulties in applying complex evidence in decision-making and ii) inadequate training and limited consultation time. The facilitators were i) availability of publicly accessible and user-friendly synopses, ii) formation of community of evidence-based practice among CMPs with input from key opinion leaders, iii) opportunity for interprofessional collaborations with conventional healthcare providers, and iv) patients' demand for evidence-based clinical advice. Besides, i) CMPs' knowledge and beliefs in evidence-based healthcare approach, ii) presentations of evidence-based information in the synopses, and iii) clinical decision making as influenced by quality of evidence reported acted as both barriers and facilitators.

conclusionsThis CFIR-based qualitative study investigated how the World Health Organization recommendation of promoting evidence use in routine practice was perceived by CMPs trained in Hong Kong after reunification with China in 1997. Key barriers and facilitators to applying evidence were identified. Such results will inform tailoring of implementation strategies for promoting evidence uptake, in the context of a well-developed health system dominated by conventional medicine.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineMedicine, Chinese TraditionalAdultChinaComplementary TherapiesFemaleHong KongHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultConsolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)Evidence-based healthcare (EBHC)Qualitative studyTraditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM)

Identifiers

PMID34266433
PMCPMC8280573
OpenAlexW3182446012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.