Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34266391›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

Three-stage segmentation of lung region from CT images using deep neural networks.

Michael Osadebey, Hilde K Andersen, Dag Waaler, Kristian Fossaa, Anne C T Martinsen, Marius Pedersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. GAN-based bone suppression using a combined loss function.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  3. Automatic assessment of lung involvement in systemic sclerosis using deep learning.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael OsadebeyDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway. michael.osadebey@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-2958
Hilde K AndersenDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Dag WaalerDepartment of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.
Kristian FossaaDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anne C T MartinsenThe Faculty of health sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Marius PedersenDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung region segmentation is an important stage of automated image-based approaches for the diagnosis of respiratory diseases. Manual methods executed by experts are considered the gold standard, but it is time consuming and the accuracy is dependent on radiologists' experience. Automated methods are relatively fast and reproducible with potential to facilitate physician interpretation of images. However, these benefits are possible only after overcoming several challenges. The traditional methods that are formulated as a three-stage segmentation demonstrate promising results on normal CT data but perform poorly in the presence of pathological features and variations in image quality attributes. The implementation of deep learning methods that can demonstrate superior performance over traditional methods is dependent on the quantity, quality, cost and the time it takes to generate training data. Thus, efficient and clinically relevant automated segmentation method is desired for the diagnosis of respiratory diseases.

methodsWe implement each of the three stages of traditional methods using deep learning methods trained on five different configurations of training data with ground truths obtained from the 3D Image Reconstruction for Comparison of Algorithm Database (3DIRCAD) and the Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) database. The data was augmented with the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC-IDRI) image collection and a realistic phantom. A convolutional neural network (CNN) at the preprocessing stage classifies the input into lung and none lung regions. The processing stage was implemented using a CNN-based U-net while the postprocessing stage utilize another U-net and CNN for contour refinement and filtering out false positives, respectively.

resultsThe performance of the proposed method was evaluated on 1230 and 1100 CT slices from the 3DIRCAD and ILD databases. We investigate the performance of the proposed method on five configurations of training data and three configurations of the segmentation system; three-stage segmentation and three-stage segmentation without a CNN classifier and contrast enhancement, respectively. The Dice-score recorded by the proposed method range from 0.76 to 0.95.

conclusionThe clinical relevance and segmentation accuracy of deep learning models can improve though deep learning-based three-stage segmentation, image quality evaluation and enhancement as well as augmenting the training data with large volume of cheap and quality training data. We propose a new and novel deep learning-based method of contour refinement.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansLungLung DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerComputed tomography (CT)Deep learning networkLung contourLung regionThree-stage segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34266391
PMCPMC8280386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.