Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34265394›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Patterns of Care, Tolerability, and Safety of the First Cohort of Patients Treated on a Novel High-Field MR-Linac Within the MOMENTUM Study: Initial Results From a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry.

Sophie R de Mol van Otterloo, John P Christodouleas, Erwin L A Blezer, Hafid Akhiat, Kevin Brown, Ananya Choudhury, Dave Eggert, Beth A Erickson, Lois A Daamen, Corinne Faivre-Finn and 27 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075305 (The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075305 recruitingnot on this map

The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUMC UtrechtRan2019 to 2030Enrolled8,000ConditionsOncology, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsRadiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient expectation and experience of MR-guided radiotherapy using a 1.5T MR-Linac.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. Optimising the MR-Linac as a standard treatment modality.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Sophie R de Mol van OtterlooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
John P ChristodouleasElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erwin L A BlezerDivision of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hafid AkhiatElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kevin BrownElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ananya ChoudhuryThe University of Manchester and The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Dave EggertElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Beth A EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Lois A DaamenDivision of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Corinne Faivre-FinnThe University of Manchester and The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, Texas.
Joel GoldweinElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shaista HafeezThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Uulke A van der HeideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Robert A HuddartThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anna M KirbyThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Susan LalondrelleThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Claire McCannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Houston, Texas.
Stella MookDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marlies E NoweeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Uwe OelfkeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Kristina OrrlingLygature, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marielle E P PhilippensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario.
Christopher J SchultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Robbert J H A TersteegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rob H N TijssenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alison C TreeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom.
Baukelien van TriestDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chia-Lin TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Helena M VerkooijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Division of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. Electronic address: H.M.Verkooijen@umcutrecht.nl.
MR-Linac Consortium

Funding

Development of functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients using novel MR-Linac deviceR01DE028290 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHRISTODOULEAS, JOHN PAUL, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$4.3M
Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 21993Cancer Research UK 28284Cancer Research UK 28701NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-field magnetic resonance-linear accelerators (MR-Linacs), linear accelerators combined with a diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and online adaptive workflow, potentially give rise to novel online anatomic and response adaptive radiation therapy paradigms. The first high-field (1.5T) MR-Linac received regulatory approval in late 2018, and little is known about clinical use, patient tolerability of daily high-field MRI, and toxicity of treatments. Herein we report the initial experience within the MOMENTUM Study (NCT04075305), a prospective international registry of the MR-Linac Consortium. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were included between February 2019 and October 2020 at 7 institutions in 4 countries. We used descriptive statistics to describe the patterns of care, tolerability (the percentage of patients discontinuing their course early), and safety (grade 3-5 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5 acute toxicity within 3 months after the end of treatment).

resultsA total 943 patients participated in the MOMENTUM Study, 702 of whom had complete baseline data at the time of this analysis. Patients were primarily male (79%) with a median age of 68 years (range, 22-93) and were treated for 39 different indications. The most frequent indications were prostate (40%), oligometastatic lymph node (17%), brain (12%), and rectal (10%) cancers. The median number of fractions was 5 (range, 1-35). Six patients discontinued MR-Linac treatments, but none due to an inability to tolerate repeated high-field MRI. Of the 415 patients with complete data on acute toxicity at 3-month follow-up, 18 (4%) patients experienced grade 3 acute toxicity related to radiation. No grade 4 or 5 acute toxicity related to radiation was observed.

conclusionsIn the first 21 months of our study, patterns of care were diverse with respect to clinical utilization, body sites, and radiation prescriptions. No patient discontinued treatment due to inability to tolerate daily high-field MRI scans, and the acute radiation toxicity experience was encouraging.

Indexed as

Particle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34265394
PMCPMC9764331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.