Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34265252›Full record

ArticleNeuron2021

When the ventral visual stream is not enough: A deep learning account of medial temporal lobe involvement in perception.

Tyler Bonnen, Daniel L K Yamins, Anthony D Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multimodal MEG and Microstructure-MRI Investigations of the Human Hippocampal Scene Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Encoding of Visual Objects in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tyler BonnenDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: bonnen@stanford.edu.
Daniel L K YaminsDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anthony D WagnerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Hu · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Biologically Plausible Computational Models of Perirhinal CortexK00EY037496 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BONNEN, TYLER · 2024 to 2025
$157k
Biologically Plausible Computational Models of Perirhinal CortexF99NS125816 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BONNEN, TYLER · 2022 to 2022
$41k
NEI NIH HHS K00 EY037496NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS125816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial temporal lobe (MTL) supports a constellation of memory-related behaviors. Its involvement in perceptual processing, however, has been subject to enduring debate. This debate centers on perirhinal cortex (PRC), an MTL structure at the apex of the ventral visual stream (VVS). Here we leverage a deep learning framework that approximates visual behaviors supported by the VVS (i.e., lacking PRC). We first apply this approach retroactively, modeling 30 published visual discrimination experiments: excluding non-diagnostic stimulus sets, there is a striking correspondence between VVS-modeled and PRC-lesioned behavior, while each is outperformed by PRC-intact participants. We corroborate and extend these results with a novel experiment, directly comparing PRC-intact human performance to electrophysiological recordings from the macaque VVS: PRC-intact participants outperform a linear readout of high-level visual cortex. By situating lesion, electrophysiological, and behavioral results within a shared computational framework, this work resolves decades of seemingly inconsistent findings surrounding PRC involvement in perception.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalVisual PerceptionAnimalsDeep LearningHumansMacacaPerirhinal Cortexbiologically plausible computational modelsconvolutional neural networkelectrophysiologicallesionmedial temporal lobememoryperceptionperirhinal cortexventral visual stream

Identifiers

PMID34265252
PMCPMC10870832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.