Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34265012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Prediction of well-being and insight into work-life integration among physicians using machine learning approach.

Masahiro Nishi, Michiyo Yamano, Satoaki Matoba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masahiro NishiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8593-3835
Michiyo YamanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoaki MatobaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in examining physician well-being and its predictive factors. However, few studies have revealed the characteristics associated with physician well-being and work-life integration using a machine learning approach. To investigate predictive factors of well-being and obtain insights into work-life integration, the survey was conducted by letter mail in a sample of Japanese physicians. A total of 422 responses were collected from 846 physicians. The mean age was 47.9 years, males constituted 83.3% of the physicians, and 88.6% were considered to be well. The most accurate machine learning model showed a mean area under the curve of 0.72. The mean permutation importance of career satisfaction, work hours per week, existence of family support, gender, and existence of power harassment were 0.057, 0.022, 0.009, 0.01, and 0.006, respectively. Using a machine learning model, physician well-being could be predicted. It seems to be influenced by multiple factors, such as career satisfaction, work hours per week, family support, gender, and power harassment. Career satisfaction has the highest impact, while long work hours have a negative effect on well-being. These findings support the need for organizational interventions to promote physician well-being and improve the quality of medical care.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionMachine LearningPhysiciansAdultFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWork-Life Balance

Identifiers

PMID34265012
PMCPMC8282024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.