Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34264926›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

A novel stochastic simulation approach enables exploration of mechanisms for regulating polarity site movement.

Samuel A Ramirez, Michael Pablo, Sean Burk, Daniel J Lew, Timothy C Elston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel A RamirezDepartment of Pharmacology and Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0293-2330
Michael PabloDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-8109
Sean BurkDepartment of Pharmacology and Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9322
Daniel J LewDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-3585
Timothy C ElstonDepartment of Pharmacology and Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-2117
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

Studies on cell polarity, chemotropism, and cell cycle controlR35GM122488 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DANIEL J LEW · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Mathematical modeling of cellular signaling systemsR35GM127145 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Timothy C Elston · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122488NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells polarize their movement or growth toward external directional cues in many different contexts. For example, budding yeast cells grow toward potential mating partners in response to pheromone gradients. Directed growth is controlled by polarity factors that assemble into clusters at the cell membrane. The clusters assemble, disassemble, and move between different regions of the membrane before eventually forming a stable polarity site directed toward the pheromone source. Pathways that regulate clustering have been identified but the molecular mechanisms that regulate cluster mobility are not well understood. To gain insight into the contribution of chemical noise to cluster behavior we simulated clustering using the reaction-diffusion master equation (RDME) framework to account for molecular-level fluctuations. RDME simulations are a computationally efficient approximation, but their results can diverge from the underlying microscopic dynamics. We implemented novel concentration-dependent rate constants that improved the accuracy of RDME-based simulations, allowing us to efficiently investigate how cluster dynamics might be regulated. Molecular noise was effective in relocating clusters when the clusters contained low numbers of limiting polarity factors, and when Cdc42, the central polarity regulator, exhibited short dwell times at the polarity site. Cluster stabilization occurred when abundances or binding rates were altered to either lengthen dwell times or increase the number of polarity molecules in the cluster. We validated key results using full 3D particle-based simulations. Understanding the mechanisms cells use to regulate the dynamics of polarity clusters should provide insights into how cells dynamically track external directional cues.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsCell MembraneCell MovementCell PolarityComputational BiologyDiffusionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID34264926
PMCPMC8315557
OpenAlexW3177690933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.