Trial reportExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2021
Validating the clinical relevance of alternative stimulant use treatment outcome measures by examining their association with 3-month follow-up outcomes.
Trial report in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life and treatment effectiveness direct and indirect effects on cocaine abstinence outcomes during cocaine use disorder treatment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026Trial
- Percentage of negative urine drug screens as a clinically meaningful endpoint for RCTs evaluating treatment for cocaine use.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of a consensus on empirically supported and clinically meaningful outcome measures for stimulant use disorders (SUDs) continues to undermine the development and evaluation of effective behavioral and pharmacological treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of four stimulant use treatment outcome measures (longest duration of abstinence [LDA], percent of negative urinalysis submitted, abstinent in the last 2 weeks of treatment, and three or more weeks of continuous abstinence) by exploring their utility via association with stimulant and alcohol use, employment and legal problems, and severity of psychiatric symptomatology collected at follow-up. Data used in these secondary analyses came from a multisite randomized contingency management treatment trial for SUDs (n = 441) conducted through the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to explore the association of four stimulant use treatment outcome measures and eight 3-month follow-up outcomes. The percent of negative urinalysis outcomes showed the most consistent performance compared to alternative outcomes, being significantly associated with better responses in all eight 3-month follow-up outcomes (β range: -169 to -241, p < .01). Both dichotomous outcome measures showed similar performances being significantly associated with four follow-up outcomes (β range: -159 to -203, p < .01). All outcome measures were consistently associated with better outcome responses at the 3-month follow-up, adding support to their clinical relevance and their adoption in SUD treatment trials. The two dichotomous outcome measures are reliable candidates to be used as endpoint outcomes, as recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.