ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The control effect of 3D spiral wind-curtain generator on respirable dust pollution during tunnelling process.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of press-in airflow rate and the distance between the pressure duct and the side wall on ventilation dust suppression performance in an excavating tunnel.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The respirable dust pollution produced in the cutting process of tunnelling machine during tunnelling process is a serious threat to the health of workers. The key to solve this problem is to build an effective ventilation system in the tunnel. In this paper, experiments were designed and implemented to obtain the temporal-spatial evolution of respirable dust pollution before and after the 3D spiral wind-curtain generator was used for tunnel auxiliary ventilation, and the CFD method was used to supplement and visualize the experimental results. Before the 3D spiral wind-curtain generator was used, the respirable dust gradually diffused from the cutting face to other spaces of the tunnel, and finally presented a stable state with time. After using the 3D spiral wind-curtain generator for auxiliary ventilation, the dust diffusion speed in the tunnel was slower than before, and the dust concentration was lower than before. When adjusting the position of the generator and installing it 20m away from the cutting face, an effective dust control wind-curtain formed within the range of 3.5 ~ 6.5m away from the cutting face. With the increase of time, the dust is stably controlled within the space of 4.5m away from the cutting face, and then pumped away by the exhaust fan, so as to purify the tunnel environment and ensure the tunnel's cleanliness and safety and efficient excavation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34264497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.