Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34264351›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2022

Value of a deep learning-based algorithm for detecting Lung-RADS category 4 nodules on chest radiographs in a health checkup population: estimation of the sample size for a randomized controlled trial.

Ju Gang Nam, Hyun Jin Kim, Eun Hee Lee, Wonju Hong, Jongsoo Park, Eui Jin Hwang, Chang Min Park, Jin Mo Goo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ju Gang NamDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jin KimDepartment of Radiology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, 07804, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hee LeeCenter for Health Promotion and Optimal Aging, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Wonju HongDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jongsoo ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Eui Jin HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Chang Min ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jin Mo GooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. jmgoo@plaza.snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-7942
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI15C1532Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI19C1129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the value of a deep learning-based algorithm in detecting Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System category 4 nodules on chest radiographs from an asymptomatic health checkup population.

methodsData from an annual retrospective cohort of individuals who underwent chest radiographs for health checkup purposes and chest CT scanning within 3 months were collected. Among 3073 individuals, 118 with category 4 nodules on CT were selected. A reader performance test was performed using those 118 radiographs and randomly selected 51 individuals without any nodules. Four radiologists independently evaluated the radiographs without and with the results of the algorithm; and sensitivities/specificities were compared. The sample size needed to confirm the difference in detection rates was calculated, i.e., the number of true-positive radiographs divided by the total number of radiographs.

resultsThe sensitivity of the radiologists substantially increased aided by the algorithm (38.8% [183/472] to 45.1% [213/472]; p < .001) without significant change in specificity (94.1% [192/204] vs. 92.2% [188/204]; p = .22). Pooled radiologists detected more nodules with the algorithm (32.0% [156/488] vs. 38.9% [190/488]; p < .001), without alteration of false-positive rates (0.09 [62/676], both). Pooled detection rates for the annual cohort were 1.49% (183/12,292) and 1.73% (213/12,292) without and with the algorithm, respectively. A sample size of 41,776 in each arm would be required to demonstrate significant detection rate difference with < 5% type I error and > 80% power.

conclusionAlthough readers substantially increased sensitivity in detecting nodules on chest radiographs from a health checkup population aided by the algorithm, detection rate difference was only 0.24%, requiring a sample size >80,000 for a randomized controlled trial. KEY POINTS: • Aided by a deep learning algorithm, pooled radiologists improved their sensitivity in detecting Lung-RADS category 4 nodules on chest radiographs from a health checkup population (38.8% [183/472] to 45.1% [213/472]; p < .001), without increasing false-positive rate. • The prevalence of the Lung-RADS category 4 nodules was 3.8% (118/3073) on the population, resulting in only 0.24% increase of the detection rate for the radiologists with assistance of the algorithm. • To confirm the significant detection rate increase by a randomized controlled trial, a sample size of 84,000 would be required.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesSample SizeSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningImage interpretation, computer-assistedLung neoplasmsRadiography

Identifiers

PMID34264351
OpenAlexW3181660417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.